Big I NY’s Dodge Honored at Industry Conference, Joins Organization’s Board

​From left to right are Maria Dressman of Elliott Group in Kansas and conference chair; Peter Quirk of ISO; and Tim Dodge The Insurance Intelligence Committee​ this week honored Tim Dodge, AU, ARM, CPCU, assistant vice-president of research and information for Big I New York, at the annual Mid-America Insurance Conference in Kansas City, Missouri. In a separate action, the committee elected Dodge to a position on its board of directors.The committee presented Dodge with one of two Agent Of Change Awards at a luncheon held on November 7, the first full day of the conference. The award was for an agenda item submitted at…

Continue ReadingBig I NY’s Dodge Honored at Industry Conference, Joins Organization’s Board

Changes Are Coming To the Cybersecurity Regulation

You may have received an email message from DFS announcing the proposed changes. That message informed recipients that they may provide comments to the department between now and Jan. 9, 2023.The 20-page proposal closely resembles a pre-proposal draft DFS published last July. Big I New York provided comments to the department in response, and DFS appears to have taken some of our comments into consideration as they wrote the formal proposed amendments.Many of the amendments are targeted toward larger “covered entities” (the regulation’s term for any person or organization licensed under the state’s banking, financial services or insurance laws,) such as insurance carriers and banks.…

Continue ReadingChanges Are Coming To the Cybersecurity Regulation

Regulation 187: A Fight Worth Fighting, Despite a Disappointing Ruling

​What Happened:For the past four years, Big I NY has been fighting a legal challenge against the New York Department of Financial Services (“DFS") concerning Amended Insurance Regulation 187. The Amended Regulation 187 requires the “Producer" to act in the “Best Interests" of the customer. It also requires that the Producer make a “suitability" “recommendation" based on an analysis of their “needs." In our view, the regulation is unfairly vague and extremely challenging for producers to comply with. We remain concerned that this will lead to reduced access to the trusted advice consumers deserve. In 2021, the Appellate Court, 3rd Department, unanimously ruled in our…

Continue ReadingRegulation 187: A Fight Worth Fighting, Despite a Disappointing Ruling